<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What If Offline Shopping Was As Difficult as Shopping Online?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.morningstarmultimedia.com/what-if-offline-shopping-was-as-difficult-as-shopping-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.morningstarmultimedia.com/what-if-offline-shopping-was-as-difficult-as-shopping-online/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Krista</title><link>http://www.morningstarmultimedia.com/what-if-offline-shopping-was-as-difficult-as-shopping-online/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link> <dc:creator>Krista</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:27:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.morningstarmultimedia.com/blog/?p=145#comment-41</guid> <description>Obviously, the piece is a bit of a satire, but the point is that most people go to search engines with a specific keyword in mind. For instance, they might first type in &quot;orange&quot;. If they do that, they&#039;ll get results for mobile telephone services, Orange UK, the Wikipedia article on the fruit and the color, a short film by the Orange Open Movie Project, Orange mountain bikes, and so on.
Once they see their results aren&#039;t mostly about fruit, they may type in +orange +fruit. If they do, they are more likely to get pages about the fruit - in Google, for instance, most of the entries are encyclopedia-like articles - but few pages that actually tell you how to buy the fruit.
From here, a searcher might go back to Google to type in +&quot;buy orange&quot; +fruit and when they do that, they get all sorts of results from fruit baskets to buying orange seeds or orange juices, etc.
So in that sense, the video is pretty accurate. Search engines can&#039;t read your mind. They don&#039;t know what your intention is. In the real world, if you want to buy an orange, you go to the grocery store and purchase it. There&#039;s context there. With search engines, there&#039;s no context, so you must keep working to refine your search until you get the results you want.
It&#039;s actually a big problem. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/Viewer.aspx?code=search_feb05&amp;page=8&amp;xsrc=go_to_8_reportx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This report by eMarketer&lt;/a&gt; sums up the problems - that most people need multiple searches to find what they are looking for and that most searches start with generic terms.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, the piece is a bit of a satire, but the point is that most people go to search engines with a specific keyword in mind. For instance, they might first type in &#8220;orange&#8221;. If they do that, they&#8217;ll get results for mobile telephone services, Orange UK, the Wikipedia article on the fruit and the color, a short film by the Orange Open Movie Project, Orange mountain bikes, and so on.</p><p>Once they see their results aren&#8217;t mostly about fruit, they may type in +orange +fruit. If they do, they are more likely to get pages about the fruit &#8211; in Google, for instance, most of the entries are encyclopedia-like articles &#8211; but few pages that actually tell you how to buy the fruit.</p><p>From here, a searcher might go back to Google to type in +&#8221;buy orange&#8221; +fruit and when they do that, they get all sorts of results from fruit baskets to buying orange seeds or orange juices, etc.</p><p>So in that sense, the video is pretty accurate. Search engines can&#8217;t read your mind. They don&#8217;t know what your intention is. In the real world, if you want to buy an orange, you go to the grocery store and purchase it. There&#8217;s context there. With search engines, there&#8217;s no context, so you must keep working to refine your search until you get the results you want.</p><p>It&#8217;s actually a big problem. <a
href="http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/Viewer.aspx?code=search_feb05&#038;page=8&#038;xsrc=go_to_8_reportx" rel="nofollow">This report by eMarketer</a> sums up the problems &#8211; that most people need multiple searches to find what they are looking for and that most searches start with generic terms.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://www.morningstarmultimedia.com/what-if-offline-shopping-was-as-difficult-as-shopping-online/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:46:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.morningstarmultimedia.com/blog/?p=145#comment-42</guid> <description>I am sure if you put &quot;oranges, fruit&quot; in a search engine you wouldn&#039;t get an idiot trying to sell you a safety cone and a t-shirt. I&#039;ll check out the other videos but the one above is just unrealistic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure if you put &#8220;oranges, fruit&#8221; in a search engine you wouldn&#8217;t get an idiot trying to sell you a safety cone and a t-shirt. I&#8217;ll check out the other videos but the one above is just unrealistic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
